subject
Physics, 19.01.2021 19:40 2605098

A student hits a hockey puck with a hockey stick and the puck speeds up. Another student claims that the student broke the Law of Conservation of Momentum
because the puck gained momentum. Which of the following is the best
explanation of why the Law is not broken in this closed system?
The Law of Conservation of Momentum only applies for objects of equal mass.
The momentum of the puck is the same before and after the hockey stick hits
the puck.
The hockey stick loses as much momentum as the puck gained.
The force on the puck cancels the force on the hockey stick because the forces
are equal and opposite.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Physics

question
Physics, 22.06.2019 12:00
In what direction does an applied force move an object
Answers: 3
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 14:40
During the experiment if you could triple the breakaway magnetic force with all other quantities left unchanged, what is the new value for the critical velocity if it was v0 (initial velocity), initially? (b) now if you halved the radius with all other quantities left unchanged, what is the new critical velocity if it was v0 (initial velocity), initially? (c) if during the experiment, critical velocity quadrupled with all other quantities left unchanged, what is the new breakaway force if its magnitude was initially f0,?
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 15:00
What is the major limitation to the light microscope?
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 16:00
Two balls, each with a mass of 0.5 kg, collide on a pool table. is the law of conservation of momentum satisfied in the collision? explain why or why not
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A student hits a hockey puck with a hockey stick and the puck speeds up. Another student claims tha...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.01.2020 23:31