A student hits a hockey puck with a hockey stick and the puck speeds up. Another
student claims that the student broke the Law of Conservation of Momentum
because the puck gained momentum. Which of the following is the best
explanation of why the Law is not broken in this closed system?
The Law of Conservation of Momentum only applies for objects of equal mass.
The momentum of the puck is the same before and after the hockey stick hits
the puck.
The hockey stick loses as much momentum as the puck gained.
The force on the puck cancels the force on the hockey stick because the forces
are equal and opposite.
Answers: 1
Physics, 22.06.2019 14:40
During the experiment if you could triple the breakaway magnetic force with all other quantities left unchanged, what is the new value for the critical velocity if it was v0 (initial velocity), initially? (b) now if you halved the radius with all other quantities left unchanged, what is the new critical velocity if it was v0 (initial velocity), initially? (c) if during the experiment, critical velocity quadrupled with all other quantities left unchanged, what is the new breakaway force if its magnitude was initially f0,?
Answers: 1
Physics, 22.06.2019 16:00
Two balls, each with a mass of 0.5 kg, collide on a pool table. is the law of conservation of momentum satisfied in the collision? explain why or why not
Answers: 1
A student hits a hockey puck with a hockey stick and the puck speeds up. Another
student claims tha...
Biology, 17.01.2020 23:31
Mathematics, 17.01.2020 23:31
Engineering, 17.01.2020 23:31
Chemistry, 17.01.2020 23:31
History, 17.01.2020 23:31
Computers and Technology, 17.01.2020 23:31
Mathematics, 17.01.2020 23:31