subject
Physics, 01.12.2020 17:00 isobelbunney

If a scientist wants to figure out how old a rock layer is, would it be useful to use a substance that takes a long time to break down (has a long half life), or a substance that breaks down quickly? A. A substance that breaks down slowly, because then there won't be enough left to measure

B. A substance that breaks down slowly, because then there will be enough left to measure.

C. A substance that breaks down quickly, so it will be all gone and we'll know it's old

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Physics

question
Physics, 22.06.2019 20:00
Using the free-body diagram, calculate the net force acting on the sled. is the sled in a state of dynamic equilibrium?
Answers: 3
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 01:30
Relative to the ground below, how many joules of potential energy does a 1000-kg boulder have at the top of a 5-m ledge?
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 02:10
What is the quantity which is measured by the area occupied below the velocity- time graph?
Answers: 2
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 02:10
Which best describes the weak nuclear force? it maintains attraction between the m ecules in liquids. it attracts the nucleus of one atom to the nucleus of another atom. it pulls all matter in the universe together it keeps particles that make up protons and neutrons together
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
If a scientist wants to figure out how old a rock layer is, would it be useful to use a substance th...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 16:20
question
Physics, 01.04.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 16:20
question
Physics, 01.04.2021 16:20