Keisha writes that if an object has any external forces acting on it, then the object can be in dynamic equilibrium but not static equilibrium. Which statement best describes Keisha’s error? An object that is not moving is always in static equilibrium. An object that is moving must be in dynamic equilibrium. An object in either state of equilibrium must have no forces acting on it. An object in either state of equilibrium must have no net force acting on it.

there is no correct list among the choices you've provided.

the list might look something like this:

-- baby human

-- piccolo

-- flute

-- soprano singer

-- trumpet

-- tenor singer

-- trombone

-- baritone singer

-- baritone horn

-- bass singer

-- tuba

since i had to make up the list myself, i made it easy on myself, and i didn't try to shuffle the string instruments and woodwinds into it too.

energy can be converted from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed in ordinary chemical or physical means. do not understand what you are asking but hope this

if the person is shown to have +90n, then ans is -10n.

if the person is shown to have -90n, then ans is +10n.

the answer to this is proletariats.

hope this : )