subject
Physics, 24.04.2020 00:32 lucylubugg

Since rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones (at 500 nm), they should be able to detect smaller values of the electric field. assuming rods and cones are sensitive to the average energy density of an electromagnetic wave, which of the following statements is correct?

a. rods are able to detect electric fields 1000 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones.
b. rods are able to detect electric fields 1000/3=333 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones.
c. rods are able to detect electric fields 1000√=32 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones.
d. rods are able to detect electric fields 3 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Physics

question
Physics, 21.06.2019 20:30
Water at room temperature of 20.0°c is poured into an aluminum cylinder which has graduation markings etched on the inside. the reading in the graduations is 300.0 cc. the cylinder with the water in it is then immersed in a constant temperature bath at a temperature of 100°c. what is the reading for the level of water on the graduations of the cylinder after the water and the cylinder reach thermal equilibrium with the bath? the volume coefficient of expansion of water is 2.07 x 10^-4 k-1, and the linear coefficient of expansion of aluminum is 23.0 x 10^-6 k-1. a) 305.0 cc b) 304.0 cc c) 303.5 cc d) 303.3 cc e) 304.5 cc
Answers: 3
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 04:00
Ametal ball with a mass of 0.028 kg is dropped from rest at a height of 1.0 meters above the ground. assuming the energy in the ball is conserved, how much kinetic energy will the ball have when it is 0.5 meters above the ground?
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 08:30
What properties of a moving object are used in determining the object's energy of motion
Answers: 2
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 22:00
Use 4 to 5 complete sentences, explain the concepts of beats and how beats are produces.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Since rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones (at 500 nm), they should be able to detect...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 26.04.2021 22:50
question
History, 26.04.2021 22:50
question
Mathematics, 26.04.2021 22:50
question
Mathematics, 26.04.2021 22:50