Let’s play devil’s advocate. What are two arguments you would use to support the claim that medical doctors and veterinarians do not need to collaborate in the way that Natterson-Horowitz is suggesting?

One argument could state that veterinarians study multiple fields of the health and disease of mammals, amphibians, birds, reptiles, and fish whereas physicians only study the human body, therefore making it unnecessary for physicians and veterinarians to collaborate since the variation is far too large between a human

Explanation:

answer:

there is no cure for hiv, although antiretroviral treatment can control the virus, meaning that people with hiv can live long and healthy lives. most research is looking for a functional cure where hiv is reduced to undetectable and harmless levels in the body permanently, but some residual virus may remain. most commonly hiv-antivirals are taken also known as nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nrti's).

answer:

yes can you brainliest my answer

Explanation: