What is the multiplicative inverse of n/3

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which of the expressions (on the photo document i inserted) together represent all solutions to the following equation? 8cos(12x)+4=-4 *the answer should be in degrees.* > i would like for someone to explain the process to find the solutions for this.

I'm a polygon i have no parallel lines i am formed 3 line segments i have one right angle two of my angles are angles what am i