All of the following statements describe the relation shown except

the diagram represents a function.
the inputs are {-1, 0, 3, 4}.
the outputs are {-2, -1, 1}.
this relation could also be represented as {(-1, 1), (0, -2), (3, 1), (4, -1)}.

if the ordered pairs are supposed to match the diagram then they are wrong the set of ordered pairs should read:

{(-1, -1), (0, -2), (3, 1), (4, -1)}

The answer is "this relation could also be represented as {(-1, 1), (0, -2), (3, 1), (4, -1)}.

because from the image the coordinates would've been, {(0, -2), (3, 1), (4, -1), (-1, -1)}

the difference between the two is that the answer claimed a point would be (-1,1), when it should have been, (-1,-1). 

If jon had $4.00 then takes away $2.25, then he should have $1.75 left. $4.00 - $2.25 = $1.75 hope this ; )