Acoach is assessing the correlation between the number of hours spent practicing and the average number of points scored in a game. the table below shows the data: number of hours spent practicing (x) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 score in the game (y) 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 26 29 part a: is there any correlation between the number of hours spent practicing and the score in the game? justify your answer. (4 points) part b: write a function which best fits the data. (3 points) part c: what does the slope and y-intercept of the plot indicate? (3 points)

Part a: yes, there is a relation. as more time they spend practising, the  higher will their score be. take for example, when they practise two hours, they get 17 points, and when they practise four hours they get 29 points. attached is a graph i did on excel with the data. there you can see that the line rises.part b: a function in this case will normally look like the following: y=mx+a."m" is the slope and "a" is the "y" when "x" is 0. so, "a" is (+)5, and "m" can be calculated by using the data/points on the graph. the slope between each following point is of 6. this is calculated by  .so we have for example points [0; 5] and [0.5; 8] ->   =6. you can verify this for every point. so the final equation is y=6x+5. on the graph attached is also the equation of the line that can also be calculated on excel.part c: the slope indicates the relation of the amount of hours practising with the resultant score. because it is positive it means that as more they practise, more they score. the y-intercept or "a" is the score they get when they don't practise at all.

Dis the correct  answer

It’s 24.6 after you round to the nearest tenths the answer should be 25.0