subject
Mathematics, 22.02.2022 01:10 dereklilgoat

Saskia is solving an equation in one variable and gets the equivalent equation 3=3. Assuming her work is correct, what can she conclude about the original equation?


Saskia is solving an equation in one variable and gets the equivalent equation 3=3. Assuming her wo

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:50
Determine if the function below is continuous. a. continuous b. not continuous, 1 hole c. not continuous, > 2 holes d. not continuous, 2 holes
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Four individuals pool money together to start a new business and agree to split the profits equally. n invests $6,000, x invests $2,000, y invests $8,000 and z invests $4,000. if the profits for the first month were $100,000, y receives than if the profits were divided in proportion to how much they invested.
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Helll ! 1,400 tons of wheat of two different varieties was delivered to the silo. when processing one variety, there was 2% of waste and 3% during the processing of the second variety of wheat. after the processing, the amount of remaining wheat was 1,364 tons. how many tons of each variety of wheat was delivered to the silo?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:00
Marco states that 7.696696669…… is a rational number because it is a repeating decimal. is he correct? justify your answer.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Saskia is solving an equation in one variable and gets the equivalent equation 3=3. Assuming her wor...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 31.03.2021 19:40
question
Mathematics, 31.03.2021 19:40