Verica didn't solve this radical equation correctly. Here is their work:

Your turn; x+3 = V1 + 2x

X

2x-2 = x-1

(zoa) = (-1)

2x-2=X²+1

0 =X²-2x-3

O=(x-3)(x+1)

x=3 or x=1

.

Why does Verica (correctly) square both sides of the

equation in Step 2?

.

What mistake does Verica make between Step 2 and

Step 3? Fix Verica's work below.

In dire need~! describe how to use area models to find the quotient 2/3 divided by 1/5. check your work by also finding the quotient 2/3 divided by 1/5 using numerical operations only.

Jahdzia wears her winter coat when the temperature is colder than -4 degrees celsius. write an inequality that is true only for temperatures (t) at which jahdzia wears her winter coat.

(co 3) the times that customers spend in a book store are normally distributed with a mean of 39.5 minutes and a standard deviation of 9.4 minutes. a random sample of 25 customers has a mean of 36.1 minutes or less. would this outcome be considered unusual, so that the store should reconsider its displays? no, the probability of this outcome at 0.035, would be considered usual, so there is no problem yes, the probability of this outcome at 0.035, would be considered unusual, so the display should be redone no the probability of this outcome at 0.359 would be considered usual, so there is no problem yes, the probability of this outcome at 0.965 would be considered unusual, so the display should be redone