Refer to the Newsela article "PRO/CON: Should We Abolish the Electoral College? Read the text under the heading "PRO: Let's Give All Voters an Equal Voice." The author makes the claim that the Electoral College is outdated. How does the author effectively support this claim?

1. is 4 and 2. is 3

step-by-step explanation:

so if you look at the first one you see that 1 is to 4 and 2 is to 8 and so on, so you can see for every 1 there is a times 4 so if it were 3 then it would be 3*4 and it is 12

for number 2 it is 3 because 1 is to 3 and 2 is to 6 so for every 1 there is 3 so if it were 3 then there would be 3*3 = 9

e^-kt = n/n0 = 0.79  

-kt = ln 0.79  

t = - ln 0.79/0.0001  

= 2357 years

step-by-step explanation:

explanation:

remove parenthesis:

=

apply rule

=

multiply fractions:

=

=

divide:

=

mordancy.

after going and makeing graphs i would go with a,

there is nothing that is matches the graph. if there was i would show you. but therefore my answer is a.

hope i

-lavira: )