Suppose you are looking to purchase a new TV. You are placing it in an opening that is 136 cm wide but want to leave at least 2 cm of room on either side of the TV. If the TV screen measures 86 cm high, what is the largest size TV, in inches, that you can purchase? TV’s are measured based on the diagonal measure. (1 inch = 2.54 cm) Write your answer as an integer.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What is the value of y? round to the nearest tenth

Determine the number of girls in a math class with 87 boys if there are 25 girls for every 75 boys