Marta simplified this expression. 4 log; + log: 2.1 – log, 3.1
In which step did she incorrectly apply a property of logarithms?
4 logs x + logs 2x - logs 3x
Step 1
Il
log, 4x + logs 2x - log 3x
Step 2
log. 8x?- logs 3x
Step 3
Il
logs (ex)
Step 4
= logs (6)

1,589.63 in.^3

step-by-step explanation:

i hope this you : d

i dont know men

step-by-step explanation:

guess at question:

a vertical line intersects the graph of g(x,y) = 0 at two points. what conclusion follows about the function f(x) implicitly defined by g(x,f(x)) = 0?

the domain of f(x) cannot include the x coordinate of any such vertical line.

informally, f(x) is not a function, and

g(x,y)=0 cannot be solved for y uniquely.

the relation r = {(x,y) such that g(x,y) = 0} is a function if

for all (a,b) ∊ r and (c,d) ∊ r, a=c implies b=d.

step-by-step explanation:

the photograph is photographer and- in the process- ourselves.

step-by-step explanation: