Mathematics, 18.09.2021 20:30 mannablofey23
An observational study found that the amount of time a child spends learning a second language is associated with standardized testing performance. The correlation coefficient was found to be r = 0.94. A conclusion was made that the more time a child spends learning a second language, the better the child performs on standardized tests. Why is such a conclusion not correct? (2 points)
The sample was not representative of the population.
The correlation value should be negative for such a conclusion.
The correlation value should equal 0 for such a conclusion.
Causation cannot be determined from an observational study.
The correlation value implies that less than 90% of the variability in standardized testing performance can be explained by learning a second language.
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00
Areal estate agent earns $32,000 a year plus $1,000 for each apartment he sells. write an equation that shows the relationship between the number of apartments abe sells,n, and the total amount he earns in a year,e. what is the total amount abe would earn from selling 10 apartments in one year
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Olive's solar powered scooter travels at a rate of 30 miles per hour. what equation can she use to calculate her distance with relation to the time she traveled? h=hours m=miles 1. h=m+30 2. m=30h 3. m=h+30 4. h=30m
Answers: 2
An observational study found that the amount of time a child spends learning a second language is as...
Mathematics, 07.11.2020 02:10
Mathematics, 07.11.2020 02:10
Arts, 07.11.2020 02:10
Mathematics, 07.11.2020 02:10
English, 07.11.2020 02:10
Mathematics, 07.11.2020 02:10
Physics, 07.11.2020 02:10
English, 07.11.2020 02:10