Write the equation of a line that is perpendicular to y = -0.3x+ 6 and that passes through the point (3, -8).

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Type the correct answer in each box. spell all words correctly. a sequence of transformations maps ∆abc onto ∆a″b″c″. the type of transformation that maps ∆abc onto ∆a′b′c′ is a . when ∆a′b′c′ is reflected across the line x = -2 to form ∆a″b″c″, vertex of ∆a″b″c″ will have the same coordinates as b′.

Marquise has 200 meters of fencing to build a rectangular garden. the garden's area (in square meters) as a function of the garden's width w w (in meters) is modeled by: a ( w ) = − w 2 + 1 0 0 w a(w)=−w 2 +100w what side width will produce the maximum garden area? meters