8/9/2021/ ឆ្នោតខ្មែរចាក់ ម៉ោង10:35ព្រឹក
​

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Write an expression that has three terms and simplifies to 4x - 7. identify the coefficient(s) and constant(s) in your expression

Seymour is twice as old as cassandra. if 16 is added to cassandra’s age and 16 is subtracted from seymour’s age, their ages become equal. what are their present ages? show !