A highway agent sampled cars going from one state to a neighboring state. In his report, he indicated that of the 90 cars sampled, 35 cars were driven by women, 55 cars were sport-utility vehicles, 47 cars had two or more passengers, 29 cars were driven by women in sport-utility vehicles, 26 cars were driven by women and had two or more passengers 21 cars were
sport-utility vehicles and had two or more passengers, and 15 cars were driven by women in sport-utility vehicles and had two or more passengers After his supervisor reads the report
she explains to the agent that he made a mistake. Explain how his supervisor knew that the agent's report contained an error
us
Tes
Dorations
crZoom
(Type a whole number)
OA. The agent's last four statements indicate that at least cars were driven by women This contradicts the agents first statement, which says that only 35 such cars were seen
OB. The agent's last four statements indicate that at least cars were sport-utility vehicles. This contradicts the agents second statement, which says that only 55 such cars
were seen
OC. The agent's first three statements indicate that at least cars were driven by women in sport-utility vehicles and had two or more passengers. This contradicts the agent's
seventh statement, which says that only 15 such cars were seen
ab and

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation:

answer: r there any options?

step-by-step explanation:

98%

step-by-step explanation: