Michael and Derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly? Explain. Michael's Proof Statement Justification 1. AB EF with transversal GJ 1. Given 2. ZAKGE ZAKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem 3 BKLEELK 3. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem 4 ZAKG 3 ELK 4 Transitive Property Derrick's Proof Statement Justification 1 AB EF with transversal GJ 1. Given 2 ZAKG ZBKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem 3. ZBKLE ZELK 3 Alternate Interior Angles Theorem 4 ZAKG E ZELK 4. Transitive Property ​