HELP: Part A: Using computer software, a correlation coefficient of r=0.51 was calculated. Based on the scatter plot, is that an accurate value for this data? Why or why not? (5 points)
Part B. Instead of comparing the number of pumpkins picked and the day in October, write a scenario that would be a causal relationship for pumpkins picked on the farm
(5 points)
Source

Part A: YES, it is.

Part B: the amount of pumpkin picked and the amount of fertilizer applied.

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A:

The closer the correlation coefficient is to 1, the stronger the relationship between two variables, and vice versa. Also, the closer the data points are on a scatter plot, the closer the correlation coefficient is to 1.

The scatter plot shown indicates a positive correlation between number of days and number of pumpkins. However, the data points are to some extent farther apart from each other. This shows a moderate relationship between the two variables. Therefore, a correlation coefficient, r, of 0.51 that was calculated can be concluded to be accurate , because an r of 0.51 depicts a moderate relationship between two variables.

Part B:

A variable that could affect the number of pumpkins picked could be amount of fertilizer applied, instead of the day in October. Thus, we can compare the amount of pumpkin picked and the amount of fertilizer applied.

  y= -3x is the required function.

step-by-step explanation:

we have been given a table:

x             y

0             0

1             -3

3             -9

-2             6

we can see that the values of y is -3 times the value of x

hence, the function would be: y= -3x.

put the values of x will give the same y as in the table that means function is satisfying the given table.

answer is : muchas/tipicas

have a nice day!

~recklesschicken