Drag each number to the correct location. Classify each number according to its value.
4.2 × 10-6
2.1 × 10-3
3.1 × 10-2
3.2 × 10-5
3.5 × 10-4
5.8 × 10-3
5.2 × 10-4
Reset Next

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What’s the answer ? use the picture to see the problem

What function has a range {yly< 5}? question on picture above^