If a researcher conducts a study of the leadership styles of higher executives, what could be a potential threat to external validity from randomly sampling from a representative sample of U. S. companies

The answer is "a disproportionate number of male leaders".

Step-by-step explanation:

Inside the event of study on styles of leadership within upper management, this excess of males threatens objectivity as a consequence of the random sample of typical US companies. This disproportion number of men were. The one method we can solve this issue is by randomly specific release to conditions. So we may divide our hundred people into 2 categories and claim.

(-1,0) and (4,0) are x-intercepts.

step-by-step explanation:

x-intercepts are all points on the x-axis.

points (-1,0) and (4,0) are both x -intercepts.

days of the week

step-by-step explanation:

javier earned more money then kyle, so that won't always be a constant term, but the days of the week do not change so that term is always constant.

edit: i meant