I save 26$ each week. I started with 65$ saved. If I want to buy a bike that costs $273, how many weeks will I have to save

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Simplify (8x2 − 1 + 2x3) − (7x3 − 3x2 + 1). −5x3 + 11x2 − 2 5x3 − 11x2 + 2 x3 + 2x2 + x3 x3 − 2x2 − x3

Jenny made a scale drawing of a city. the scale she used was 5 inches = 1 yard. what is the scale factor of the drawing?