Barret purchased a piece of sandpaper for his electric sander. the radius of the sandpaper is 3.5 inches. approximately what area does the sandpaper cover ignoring the center whole. Use 3.14 for pi A 153.86in² b. 21.98in² C 43.96in² D 38.465in²​

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Use the multiplier method to incrases £258 by 43%

Which of the following statements is not true? a.parallel lines are lines in the same plane that never intersect. b.congruent figures have the same shape and same size angles and sides. c.similar figures must have the same shape and the same size. d.a rotation is when you turn a figure around a certain point.