A researcher is 95% confident that the interval from 3.6 hours to 8.1 hours captures μ = the true mean amount of daily screen time for US adults. Is there evidence that the true mean number of hours of screen time for US adults is greater than 3.5?

No. There is not evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because 3.5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
No. There is not evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because there are values within the 95% confidence interval other than 3.5.
Yes, there is evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because 3.5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
Yes, there is evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because the entire 95% confidence interval is greater than 3.5.

idk lol

step-by-step explanation:

i think c. but don't trust it.

step-by-step explanation:

(0,-3) see attached graph

step-by-step explanation:

a. to solve the system, graph the two equations.

x = y+3 becomes y=x-3 has m=1/1 and b=-3. start at (0,-3) on the y-axis and plot a point. then move up 1 unit and 1 unit to the right. plot a point and connect.

y=-4x+3 has m =-4/1 and b=-3. start at (0,-3) on the y-axis and plot a point. then move down four units and to the right 1 unit. plot a point and connect.

the solution is the point (x,y) where the two lines intersect. by the graph below it is (0,-3).

b. to solve by substitution, substitute y = -4x-3 into x= y+3

x= (-4x-3) +3

x=-4x

5x=0

x=0

now substitute x = 0 back in to find y.

y= -4(0)-3

y=0-3

y=-3

solution is (0,-3)

c. use elimination by adding the equations together.

x-y=3

4x+y=-3

5x=0

x=0

then substitute into one equation to find y.

y=-4(0)-3

y=-3