StopAnswering answered the question13:44 Creati deleted the answer of user Deleted account12:40
04/21/2021

Nayefx has reported answer of user Deleted account01:45
04/20/2021

Deleted account answered the question16:44
NoblePenguin deleted the answer of user StopAnswering16:41
Adept has reported answer of user ICxtoonCxtI15:16
Adept has chosen the answer of user StopAnswering as the Brainliest15:16
Adept has reported answer of user StopAnswering15:16
ICxtoonCxtI answered the question15:15
StopAnswering answered the question13:46
04/19/2021

NoblePenguin deleted the answer of user StopAnswering18:33
echo2155 deleted the answer of user heyheyheyitsthekkk15:41
Adept has chosen the answer of user StopAnswering as the Brainliest12:22
StopAnswering answered the question12:20
04/18/2021

NoblePenguin deleted the answer of user StopAnswering15:49
StopAnswering answered the question14:47
echo2155 deleted the answer of user StopAnswering12:26
StopAnswering answered the question11:20
04/17/2021

joy123333 deleted the answer of user Deleted account19:52
04/14/2021

Deleted account answered the question13:10
venus1324 deleted the answer of user Deleted account12:51
Adept has reported answer of user Deleted account12:32
Deleted account answered the question12:30
04/13/2021

joy123333 deleted the answer of user Deleted account16:25
04/12/2021

Adept has reported answer of user heyheyheyitsthekkk13:00
heyheyheyitsthekkk answered the question12:56
04/11/2021

Adept has reported answer of user Deleted account15:43
Deleted account answered the question15:30
03/28/2021

Adept asked a question16:25

???

Step-by-step explanation:

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.