Kailey wrote 8,912,000 in scientific notation as 89.12 times 10 Superscript 5. Which statement best describes Kailey’s work? Kailey is correct: 89.12 times 10 Superscript 5 equals 8,912,000.
Kailey is not correct: the exponent of ten should be negative.
Kailey is correct: it is written as a decimal number multiplied by a power of ten.
Kailey is not correct: 89.12 times 10 Superscript 5 is not written in scientific notation

i would be happy to . most people on would also love to i'm sure. if you just want someone who has done algebra before and want a little more personal relationship than just begging strangers for , i can certainly be of service. i do have college myself so i might not be 24/7.

m∠abd = m∠dbc

step-by-step explanation:

given : ab bisects ∠dbc

as we know that bisection means ab divides   ∠dbc   in two equal angles named as   ∠dba and   ∠abc

so, m∠abd = m∠dbc  

because ab bisects ∠dbc.

hence , the first statement m∠abd = m∠dbc is true.