Is the given conjecture a valid rule for the following sequence? if not, give a counterexample. sequence: 1, 2, 3, 6, 18, 108, conjecture: multiply the previous 2 terms to get the next term

Select all the correct answers.natalie buys a new car. in the first month, the odometer on the car records 800 miles. from past experience, she expects to drive 900 miles per monthselect all the functions that can be used to find the number of miles, f(n), recorded on the odometer after n months.of(n) = 800n + 100f(n) = 9001 - 100f(n) = 900n + 800(1) = 800; }(n) = f(n - 1) + 900, for n > 2f(1) = 800; 1(n) = f(n − 1) + 100, for n > 2(1) = 900; }(n) = f(n - 1) + 800, for n > 2

On a piece of paper graft y+2> -3x-3 then determine which answer matches the graph you drew

Which must be true in order for the relationship △zyv ~ △xwv to be correct? zy ∥ wx ∠z ≅ ∠y and ∠w ≅ ∠x zv ≅ vy and wv ≅ vx ∠z ≅ ∠x and ∠w ≅ ∠y