Claire thinks that if she draws a parallelogram with 2 congruent sides, it must be a rhombus. jacob thinks that she would need to draw a parallelogram with at least 3 congruent sides before she could be sure it was a rhombus. who is correct, if anyone, and why?

a: only claire is correct, because if the figure is a parallelogram and 2 sides are congruent, it must have all 4 sides congruent.

b: only jacob is correct, because a parallelogram with 4 congruent sides must have 2 pairs of opposite sides that are congruent.

c: both are correct because if a figure has at least 2 congruent sides, it must have 4 congruent sides.

d: neither is correct because one would need to draw 4 congruent sides in order to be sure the figure was a rhombus

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer is B, but the explanation given is slightly false, because every parallelogram has two pairs of Congruent sides

Note: congruent sides are sides with equal length

What makes it a Rhombus is when every single side is equal, reason Jacob is correct is because if three sides are equal, the fourth side will automatically be equal to each of the three sides, you can experiment with a measured ruler and a pencil

but a normal parallelogram has two different pairs of congruent sides, 1 pair will be different in length with the other pair, from this explanation, you can see my Claire is wrong

a line is an defined derm because it

a)contains an infinite number of points b) can be used to create other geometric shapes c)describes something that does not have width or depth d) is a term that does not have a formal definition. a line is an undefined term because it: contains an infinite number of points.