For which experiment would you expect the actual results to be closest to the results predicted by theoretical probability?
a person flipping a coin 10 times
a person flipping a coin 100 times
© five people each flipping a coin 10 times
ten people each flipping a coin 20 times
Hay

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What is the length of an with endpoints a 3,2 and b 8,14

Choose the equation below that represents the line that passes through the point (2, 4) and has a slope of 3. a) y − 4 = 3(x − 2) b) y − 2 = 3(x − 4) c) y + 4 = 3(x + 2) d) y + 2 = 3(x + 4)