Two hypothetical outcomes for the same repeated-measures experiment are shown. Outcome A
Participant I II III
A 50 55 60
B 51 56 61
C 50 57 61
D 52 58 63

Outcome B
Participant I II III
A 50 51 50
B 60 60 60
C 70 71 70
D 80 80 80

For each outcome, consider the scores and note how they vary from treatment to treatment and from participant to participant (without making any calculations). Then answer the following questions by comparing outcome A to outcome B.

Outcome A appears to have between-subjects variance than (as) outcome B. Outcome A appears to have between-treatments variance than (as) outcome B. Assuming that the variability caused by random and unsystematic factors is the same in the two outcomes, you can predict that outcome A has F-ratio than (as) outcome B.

answer: what are the answer choices?

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

why? because i noticed a pattern. 60 120. those numbers without the zero, make the 6 times tables leaving your answer to be b since 6 times 4 is 24 and adding a zero making it 240.

answer: the proof is mentioned below.

step-by-step explanation:

since, given:   lines bc = ef

prove:   lines ac > ef

          statements                                           reason

1. bc=ef                                           1. given

2. ac= ab+bc                                 2. because b is the point between the  

                                                            line segment ac

3.   ac > bc                                       3. because if a line segment is equal to

                                                          the sum of two line segments then it is

                                                          always greater then each of these

                                                          individual line segments

4. ac > ef                                         4. by equality property.

explanation:

the loan estimate encourages consumers to shop. since it is the lenders who are required to issue a standardized loan estimate in a specific time frame, this way consumers are provided an opportunity to compare lenders and their products. otherwise consumer wouldn't know the benefits offered by other lenders.  

if a loan originator does not provide a loan estimate within 3 business days of receiving a completed loan application, that lender is in violation. lenders are required to issue a loan estimate within 3 days of applying for a loan or within 7 days prior to closing. having a loan estimate has following information.

not having loan estimate won't give you an idea of money to be borrowed.

you get to know your interest rates.

you also get to know if your interest rate can or may vary.

not having a good faith estimate can keep you unaware of aforementioned points.