The article presents a model for the time elapsed between the arrival of consecutive vehicles on urban roads. Following are 137 arrival times (in seconds) along with the values expected from a theoretical model. Time Observed Expected 0–2 18 23 2–4 28 18 4–6 14 17 6–8 9 13 8–10 11 11 10–12 11 9 12–18 10 19 18–22 6 8 > 22 30 19 Can you conclude that the theoretical model does not explain the observed values well? Find the P-value and state a conclusion. Since (Click to select) , we (Click to select) conclude that the theoretical model does not explain the observed values well.

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

m

step-by-step explanation:

if i'm not wrong, i would say that the third angle has (72) because the three sides of all triangles have 180 degrees and if we subtract 180 - 62 - 40 = (72) / but i'm not sure about 40 yd.