Phillip is asked to solve the following inequality: 6. 3x > 6 -
His work:
6- 3x > 6
-6. -6
——————-
-3x > 0
——. ——
-3. -3
x > 0
Reminder: There is a line under the >.
Did Philip solve the inequality correctly? If not, where in the solution did Philip make an error?

(The second -6 is under 6. Please answer)

guess at question:

a vertical line intersects the graph of g(x,y) = 0 at two points. what conclusion follows about the function f(x) implicitly defined by g(x,f(x)) = 0?

the domain of f(x) cannot include the x coordinate of any such vertical line.

informally, f(x) is not a function, and

g(x,y)=0 cannot be solved for y uniquely.

the relation r = {(x,y) such that g(x,y) = 0} is a function if

for all (a,b) ∊ r and (c,d) ∊ r, a=c implies b=d.

step-by-step explanation:

your answer is 125y5