Here are my stats
try to compare yours to mine

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Which rectangle if translated 6 units right and 16 units down and the rotated 90° clockwise about the point (4, -11) will result in rectangle e?

Factor the following polynomial completely 514 + 2013 - 1052 oa. 5121 + 3)( - ) ob. 51%(1 - 3)(1 + 7) oc. 5198 - 3)(x + 7) od 51%(+ 3)(x - 7)