How long would it take me to earn 139.50 of interest at a 6% interest rate if i started with 930

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Apool measures 12.3 feet by 16.6 feet. if the longer wall of the pool has a diagonal of 17.8 feet, what is the volume of the pool? (round to nearest tenth)

Which function has the domain x> -11