Can someone pls help I'm very confused
10(1/2 d+3m) +3d(5)

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Lena reflected this figure across the x-axis. she writes the vertices of the image as a'(−2, 8), b'(−5, 6), c'(−8, 8), d'(−4, 2).

The width of a rectangle is 20 units. can the perimeter p of the rectangle be 64 units when its length x is 11 units? no, because p = 2x + 2(20) no, because p ≠ 2x + 2(20) yes, because p ≠ 2x + 2(20) yes, because p = 2x + 2(20)