subject
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 04:00 Kurlyash

12. Arnold says that 2 = 4, and he uses the drawing in Figure 3.32 to support his conclu-
sion. What is wrong with Arnold's reasoning?
Do not just state the correct way to convert 23;
explain why Arnold's reasoning is not valid.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
In two or more complete sentences, determine the appropriate model for the given data and explain how you made your decision. (1,-1), (2,0.5), (5,1.5), (8,2)
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Billy plotted −3 4 and −1 4 on a number line to determine that −3 4 is smaller than −1 4 .is he correct? explain why or why not
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Ab based on the given diagram, if m_1 = 60° then m 2 = 30 60 90 180
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30
On her first stroke, maya hit a golf ball 146 yards, 2 feet, 11 inches. on her second stroke, she hit it 163 yards, 1 foot, 2 inches. how far did the ball go all together? convert the answer to larger units whenever possible.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
12. Arnold says that 2 = 4, and he uses the drawing in Figure 3.32 to support his conclu-
sio...
Questions