Plz anyone do me a solid

A) We know that the table is 6ft long, and the tablecloth is 180cm long.

We know that:

1in = 2.54 cm

we also know that:

1ft = 12 in

Then 6 ft, is equal to 6 times 12 inches.

6ft = 6*12in = 72in

And we know that each inch is equal to 2.54cm, then 72 inches is equal to 72 times 2.54cm, this is:

72in = 72*2.54 cm = 182.88cm

So the table is longer than the tablecloth, this means that the tablecloth is not long enough to cover the table.

B) The ratio is:

3 parts of red paint to 4 paints of blue paint.

This means that if you have 4 fluid ounces of blue paint, you should need 3 fluid ounces of red paint.

But Chris has half that amount of blue paint (2 fluid ounces) so he also should use half that amount of red paint.

Then he needs:

(3 fluid ounces of red paint)/2 = 1.5 fluid ounces of red paint.

C) We know that one dozen costs $15.

There are 12 muffins in one dozen.

Then the cost per muffin, will be equal to the total cost divided by the number of muffins, this is:

Cost per muffin = $15/12 = $1.25

Each muffin costs $1.25

D) The total number of dozens made is:

18 + 16 + 24 + 14 = 72

So there are 72 dozens, this represents the 100%

72 = 100%

And there are 18 dozens of pumpkin muffins, we want to know which percentage represents 18.

Then:

18 = X%.

So we have the two equations:

18 = X%.

72 = 100%

Now we can take the quotient of these equations and we will get:

(18/72) = (X%/100%)

Solving this for X%, we get:

(18/72)*100% = X% = 25%

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation:

b

step-by-step explanation: