Researchers are testing a treatment for tumors. They've found that tumors are shrinking in patients receiving the new treatment. Their calculations
suggest that if chance were the only factor, there's a 9% chance they'd get
the same results. At a .01 significance level, do the researchers have proof
the new treatment is working?
A. No. They may have one piece of evidence, but they don't have
proof.
B. Can't be determined.
C. Yes. The significance level is low enough to be proof.
D. No. The P-value isn't low enough.
E. Yes. The Pvalue is lower than the significance level.

step-by-step explanation:

i love jeffery and believe there is truth in tati and james' answers

step-by-step explanation:

yes i have heard the tea

i believe both

no, tati didnt over exaggerate

james might might idk and tbh dont rly care

it is definatly the 3rd one. very much looks like it, for a good chance, the third one would be best for you.

8(4)^8=72^feet to say that the total can conclude to 8(4) which as you know would mean 8 x 4. that equals 32w. 32^ could make a 72 answer as well. but your coefficent will remain w so your answer is 72w.

you!

if you need more with your math, visit khan academy where we give videos and tutorials   on everything math. we are efficent in our work.

you,

from,

the khan academy team