The mailman delivered a $22 check and 3-$14 bills today. he also took back 1-$5 bill. what is the total in the mailbox

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which transformations could have occurred to map △abc to △a"b"c"? a rotation and a reflection a translation and a dilation a reflection and a dilation a dilation and a rotation

The table shows the distance traveled over time while traveling at a constant speed.