What is the area of the triangle?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Using inductive reasoning, what are the next two number in this set? 2,3/2,4/3,5/4,

As voters exit the polls, you ask a representative random sample of voters if they voted for a proposition. if the true percentage of voters who vote for the proposition is 63%, what is the probability that, in your sample, exactly 5 do not voted for the proposition before 2 voted for the proposition? the probability is