Janet is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m ZAGE m2CHE in her sketch. What is the missing justification in the proof? Statement
Justification
ABCD with transversal EF Given
m ZAGE ZHGB
Vertical Angles Theorem
m ZHGB mZCHE
Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
m ZAGE m2CHE

answer: 34rtyj,jkhtyetwrhyjeuiejnbhdfknbkguxfrbhkfdbjvkmbd,kvbsd.kxjvbhjnfbgjxdfn

step-by-step explanation:

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this

$15 each

step-by-step explanation:

$45/3 children= $15 each