Given the drawing as shown below and that p || a, which of the following cannot be supported by the evidence shown? A - B - C - D -

D. <b ≅ <g

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that lines p and q are parallel to each other, therefore the following can be concluded:

✔️<f ≅ <h, this is because they are both Vertical angles.

✔️<d and <h are supplematry, this is because they are same side consecutive interior angles. Consecutive angles are supplematry.

✔️<a and <b are supplematry, this is because they are linear pair angles.

✔️<b cannot be congruent to <g. They are not corresponding angles, nor are they alternate interior angles.

3. parallelogram

step-by-step explanation:

we turn each of our sides into direction vectors

ab=b-a=(3 - 7, 1 - 0) = (-4, 1)

bc=c-b=(1,6)

cd=d-c=(4,-1)

da=a-d=(-1,-6)

we see how the opposite sides have negated direction vectors; this is characteristic of a parallelogram.   we have congruent sides ab=cd and bc=da with unequal lengths because 1^2+6^2 is different from (-4)^2+1^2.   so it's not a square or a rhombus.  

we check the dot product of direction vectors of adjacent sides.   we have

ab dot bc = -4(1) + 1(6) = 2

that's not zero so the sides are not perpendicular.   we've ruled out rectangle.

the direction vectors indicate two pairs of congruent parallel sides, so we choose parallelogram over trapezoid.