subject
Mathematics, 17.12.2020 02:30 Natasha019

Willis has noticed that when time has been one of the variables analyzed by a scatterplot he has looked at, it has always been the independent variable. He has hypothesized that time can never be a dependent variable. Does the scatterplot below confirm or invalidate Willis’s hypothesis?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:30
What is the value of y? round to the nearest tenth
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
Can someone me i’m confused. will give brainliest and a whole bunch of points
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
Jose bought 20 shares of netflix at the close price of $117.98. in a few years, jose sells all of his shares at $128.34. how much money did jose make? a.) $192.50 b.) $207.20 c.) $212.50 d.) $224.60
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30
1. evaluate 8x(2)y9(-2) for x=-1 and y=2 2. simplify the equation. -() 3. simplify the expression. [tex]\frac{5}{x(-2) y9(5)}[/tex]
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Willis has noticed that when time has been one of the variables analyzed by a scatterplot he has loo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2021 14:00