She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function. Which best explains the accuracy of Geraldine's statements and her conclusion? Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled. Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved. The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of integers. The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

fsfd

step-by-step explanation:

fdddff

after simplifying it i got: -36.25 as my answer. hope that !

answer 1 : option "c"

answer 2 : option "d"

answer 3 : option "b"

answer 4 : option "d"

answer 5 : option "b"

answer 6 : option "a"

answer 7 : option "c"

answer 8 : option "d"

answer 9 : option "c"

answer 10 : option "d"

answer 11 : option "c"

answer 12 option "b"

answer 13 option "c"

answer 14 option "c"

answer 15 option "d"

answer 16 option "a"

answer 17 option "b"

answer 18 option "c"

answer 19 option "a"

answer 20 option "a"

answer 21 option "c"

d