You use a line of best fit for a set of data to make a prediction about an unknown value. the correlation coeffecient is -0.833 can you be confident that your predicted value will be reasonably to the actual value? why or why not? please help.

The square root of π has attracted attention for almost as long as π itself. When you’re an ancient Greek mathematician studying circles and squares and playing with straightedges and compasses, it’s natural to try to find a circle and a square that have the same area. If you start with the circle and try to find the square, that’s called squaring the circle. If your circle has radius r=1, then its area is πr2 = π, so a square with side-length s has the same area as your circle if s2  = π, that is, if s = sqrt(π). It’s well-known that squaring the circle is impossible in the sense that, if you use the classic Greek tools in the classic Greek manner, you can’t construct a square whose side-length is sqrt(π) (even though you can approximate it as closely as you like); see David Richeson’s new book listed in the References for lots more details about this. But what’s less well-known is that there are (at least!) two other places in mathematics where the square root of π crops up: an infinite product that on its surface makes no sense, and a calculus problem that you can use a surface to solve.

Step-by-step explanation: this is the same paragraph The square root of π has attracted attention for almost as long as π itself. When you’re an ancient Greek mathematician studying circles and squares and playing with straightedges and compasses, it’s natural to try to find a circle and a square that have the same area. If you start with the circle and try to find the square, that’s called squaring the circle. If your circle has radius r=1, then its area is πr2 = π, so a square with side-length s has the same area as your circle if s2  = π, that is, if s = sqrt(π). It’s well-known that squaring the circle is impossible in the sense that, if you use the classic Greek tools in the classic Greek manner, you can’t construct a square whose side-length is sqrt(π) (even though you can approximate it as closely as you like); see David Richeson’s new book listed in the References for lots more details about this. But what’s less well-known is that there are (at least!) two other places in mathematics where the square root of π crops up: an infinite product that on its surface makes no sense, and a calculus problem that you can use a surface to solve.

all three statements are true

step-by-step explanation:

a shipping fee of 5% is charged online with every item purchased online

first let's just take each option and calculate them based on this, to see if the answers matched

keith buys a 40 dollar book

40 x 0.05 = 2

therefore there will be a two dollar fee on keith's book

40 + 2 =42

the first statement is true

a chair costs $80

80 x 0.05 = 4

80 + 4 = 84

the second statement is true

george buys a 20 dollar calculator

20 x 0.05 = 1

20 + 1 = 21

the third statements are true

all three statements are true