The graph shows quadrilaterals Q and R. 2
Which statement justifies whether or not the two quadrilaterals are congruent?
O A. Yes, because R is the result of reflecting Q across the x-axis.
OB. Yes, because R is the result of reflecting Q across the line y = x.
OC. No, because R can only be obtained from Q by a series of rigid transformations.
OD. No, because R cannot be obtained from Q by a series of rotations and translations.
OE. Yes, because R is the result of rotating Q by 90° counter-clockwise about the origin.

this is a very good question

step-by-step explanation:

i got a hair cut today from my mom not to flex just to flex kim jon un is one rad fellow i'd say you'd need to take the hairline in kinda like a box shape like someone rammed a lego brick into your head. from there you really need to take the top up keeping with that boxy aesthetic, finally coat the whole thing with gel if your country economics are failing or whatever you can just coat it with the starving children's food rations. about 5 orphans per strand is a good ratio. good luck with the fresh cut my dude

answer: 10 meter

step-by-step explanation:

need details

answer: c, the green line

step-by-step explanation:

there is no black line, eliminate b.

simple interest implies periodic payments, but the red line shows no payments, eliminate d.

simple interest has equal payments. if paid say every day, the graph is about a straight line (actually a stairstep).

the yellow line is not straight, eliminate a.

check: the green line is straight, answer is c.

simple interest with positive interest rate gives a straight line sloping up to the right. green line:

g(t) = $100 + ($200-$100) ÷ (20 years) × (t years)

= $100 + (4%/year) × ($100)(t years)

incidentally, the yellow line curving upward represents continuously compounded interest

y = $100 × 2^(t years / (14 assuming the yellow line hits $200 at 14 years. 2^0 is 1, so y(0) = $100; 2^(14/14) is 2, so y(14) = $200.