WILL RATE THE BRAINLIST Explain how you can prove your observations in question 3 using a traditional proof. You don't need to develop the steps of the proof; simply describe an approach that you might use. Which theorems might appear in your proof? (Hint: Use the two diagonals of the parallelogram to assist you in describing an approach.)

Rectangles are parallelograms. By definition, opposite sides are congruent and all four angles have the same measure. Drawing the two diagonals of a rectangle divides the rectangle into triangles. If I choose a pair of triangles that each have a different diagonal for a side, I can prove them to be congruent. If the triangles are congruent, the corresponding sides (diagonals of the rectangle in this case) are also congruent.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer on plato

the answer is 31.27mph

c: y > - 1/6x + 1

step-by-step explanation:

dashed line - meaning this < or > also not equal

solid line - meaning this < or > also equal

your answer is c because y > means up & it's shaded up, but y < means down

hope this ! : )