Is the following a function? Explain why or why not. *Yes, this does represent a function, because all the points are distinct (none of them are
coincident)
*No, this does not represent a function, since a function can not be made up of only points.
*No, this does not represent a function, since it fails the vertical line test.
*No, this does not represent a function, since a function is made up of many more points.

the direct variation says that:

then the equation is of the form is given by:

            where k is the constant variation.

from the given table:

consider any value of x and m(x)=y

x = 2 and m(x)=y = 3

substitute these value in [1]; we have;

divide both sides by 2 we get;

⇒

check:

put x = -1 and m(x) = -1.5

substitute in the equation:

-1.5 = -1.5                   true

therefore, the function m(x) represents a direct variation

graph of this function as shown below:

heyyy

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

hans did not square the 40-unit side; he merely multiplied it by 2.   incorrect.