PLEASE HELP ME 16. Hannah claims that −3 is not a rational number because it is not written as a ratio of integers. Is she correct? Explain why or why not.

she is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

rational numbers are not whole numbers, and -3 is a whole number. For example, -1/3 is a rational number, but -3 is not.

Sorry if im wrong, im bad at math :(

i believe the answer is 68cm

step-by-step explanation:

i just took 34 x 2 because the space between v and y is the same as y to k.

let's first notice, the center of the hyperbola is at the origin, since the focus points are equidistantly 3 units away from the origin, that also means that the distance "c" from the center to either focus is 3.

it should also be notable that, the traverse axis for this hyperbola is vertical, or namely over the y-axis and therefore, the positive fraction will be the one with y-variable.

the traverse "a" component or distance from the center to either vertex is not 2, is more than 2, so we can safely put it at √5 ≈ 2.24.