In an indirect proof by contraposition, the first step is to _. A.
assume the conclusion, or q, is false
B.
show that the assumption leads to a contradiction
C.
assume the hypothesis, or p, is false
D.
show that a definition or theorem proves the hypothesis correct

i'm assuming it's looking for the missing length, which should be 4cm

hope this !

for the friend request.

when a figure, such as triangle (xyz) is reflected over the line y = x to create x'y'z' the x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the original image (pre-image) will be reversed for the image. (e.g., (x, y) > (y, x)) this means that the pre-image position of the x- and y-coordinates switch places which in turn provides a mirror like image of the original xyz.  

i notice that when i draw a line segment from x to x', that the points are parallel from each other -- they are exactly across from each other and do not intersect with any other points.  

yes, think i would see the same characteristic if you drew the line segment connecting y with the reflecting line and then y' with the reflecting line because of the essence of reflections. because it is a mirror image, each point was effected the same way which leads me to conclude that they same would apply to y and y'.

you can't solve x because it is 2 linear equation and you only have one equation

b mark me branliest thx

step-by-step explanation: